Published: Jan 19 2007 / 05:25
firstname.lastname@example.org reported this link as inaccurate on 01/19/2007 @ 10:43:54Link is unreliable.
The link ended up on Digg with 2500 votes.... it's no wonder it's down.
I'm starting to think digg and /. should start caching static content on submission, just for the first day then drop it
That's been discussed for years... but caching data has legal and monetary issues.
Isn't the duggmirror caching everything?
they've done a few articles I've liked, and this is another
Good techs, thanks!
Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy - © 1997-2014, DZone, Inc.