By meeras
via javalobby.org
Published: Jan 06 2008 / 10:28
In the reviewer's opinion, the authors have targeted a very narrow segment of the developer community viz. beginners to Spring who are going to be working on a simple web application not involving other frameworks. The reviewer felt that quite a few corners have been cut in order to make the book palatable to this community. In a lot of places, the value of the book was undercut because of adherence to this goal. Maybe there was some fear of an overlap of material vis-a-vis the other Apress Spring books already out in the market.
Comments
lamboap replied ago:
The supplied source code is pretty unorganized.
rick replied ago:
lamboap, it isn't clear to me whether your down vote is about the link or the book that has been reviewed? Personally, I always hope for people's votes to represent their perspective on the links, themselves. When someone votes down a Ruby link, for example, merely because the subject is Ruby, then it makes the whole concept of voting a little bit less reliable. It would be better for the down vote to regard the specific link rather than ALL Ruby links.
Cheers,
Rick
Voters For This Link (6)
Voters Against This Link (2)