Link Details

guess what, alot of people actually do have lists like that and are actually experienced in each

Being a manager-type, you know acronyms and names, but being a programmer-type (for a long time, perhaps longer than you've been a manager), I can say that (a) that's not even close to a comprehensive list of all current acronyms, and (b) it's entirely possible for a candidate to have all those things under his belt, especially since many of them are related.

Granted, when hiring, one often has the unenviable task of going through stacks of resumes, and snap judgments are sometimes unavoidable. But a snap judgment based primarily on the list of acronyms on the guy's resume seems arbitrary and, well, not entirely rational. Having done my share of resume-winnowing and interviewing, I certainly have my share of resume red flags, but that particular one isn't one of them.

As a technical guy, your overfocus on those acronyms makes me wonder about *your* judgment.

What is often the case, though, is that the laundry list of abbreviations doesn't represent the applicant's strengths. It represents anything they've ever seen or touched ever, regardless of how truly comfortable they are with that particular technology. For instance, you tend to get things like "one time I made a basic calculator application in MFC using C++" and that somehow translates to both MFC and C++ ending up on that list regardless of the fact that the knowledge was minimal at the time of using it and it hasn't been touched in a decade.

I agree that there are some people who truly do have the skill sets that they claim but experience has shown me that more often than not, they're very familiar with

What is often the case, though, is that the laundry list of abbreviations doesn't represent the applicant's strengths. It represents anything they've ever seen or touched ever, regardless of how truly comfortable they are with that particular technology. For instance, you tend to get things like "one time I made a basic calculator application in MFC using C++" and that somehow translates to both MFC and C++ ending up on that list regardless of the fact that the knowledge was minimal at the time of using it and it hasn't been touched in a decade.

I agree that there are some people who truly do have the skill sets that they claim but experience has shown me that more often than not, they're very familiar with less than 5 of those items and the rest are things that they saw one time in their careers, barely scratched the surface and never touched again.

i think this 'manager-type' guy just envy. =)

Some people are actually good at this (programming/etc) and it doesn't take them 10 years to learn one thing.

Voted down for being a pointy haired manager. I'll not stand for this douche-baggery!