BIRT 3.7
Written by: Michael Williams
Featured Refcardz: Top Refcardz:
  1. HTML5 Canvas
  2. Ruby
  3. iPhone/iPad
  4. Spring Web Flow
  5. REST
  1. jQuery Selectors
  2. Spring Config.
  3. Java
  4. Ajax
  5. Java Concurrency

Link Details

Link 484237 thumbnail
User 478055 avatar

By mitchp
via techcrunch.com
Published: Sep 10 2010 / 16:38

This past weekend, I wrote a post wondering if Android was surging in the U.S. market because Apple was letting it? The main thought was that by remaining exclusively tied to AT&T, Apple was driving some users to choose Android, which is available on all the U.S. carriers. In the post, I posed a question: if it’s not the iPhone/AT&T deal, why do you choose Android?
  • 13
  • 5
  • 1885
  • 1

Comments

Add your comment
User 203253 avatar

James Williams replied ago:

-1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

While I welcome open debate, this article is from a person who claimed that Android was big ONLY because Apple let it due to the iPhone being AT&T only .

Linkage here to that drivel: http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/05/apple-android/

User 287085 avatar

javawerks replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Actually, I found this article to be most interesting. I had no idea that US carriers where tuning Android in an effort to limit choice of the average user. It's a worthy read, less the author's odd bias. The comments are enlightening as well.

User 265881 avatar

Topnotch replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Yep I totally agree. Pointing out the evil deeds of carriers who deny customer choice on a supposedly open platform doesn't mean that Android is deficient as a development platform but that the carriers are deficient in morality.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.