Link Details

Link 112014 thumbnail
User 286188 avatar

By theunixgeek
via theunixgeek.blogspot.com
Published: Sep 09 2008 / 12:32

Which is more important: time to write the program or time to run the program?
  • 4
  • 19
  • 2566
  • 749

Comments

Add your comment
User 111696 avatar

bloid replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

>> Which is more important: time to write the program or time to run the program?

Or, the time to get your benchmarks correct?

User 306229 avatar

Vhaerun replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Why is perl included in the tags ?

User 200692 avatar

whiskeyjack replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

The comments has an additional Perl one. Regardless, this is a pretty barebones "test". Lies, damn lies and benchmarks and so forth.

User 281050 avatar

cbang replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Obviously time to write the program is the more important. In 18 months your application will run twice as fast without you having to do anything. Add to that the performance benefits you get if adopting a virtual machine (Jython or IronPython).

User 189831 avatar

karmazilla replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply
User 239201 avatar

amphi replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Oh man... I've seen so many benchmarks, but that's probably the worst. A small piece of code is repeated... what? A whopping 14 times?

And then some loop which increments some number and then prints it? WTF? The bottleneck there is... printing. D'uh. Completely pointless.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.