By bloid
via codecommit.com
Published: Oct 17 2007 / 04:18
One of the main complaints I’ve heard leveled against ActiveObjects is that it’s just not suitable for mapping to legacy schemas. More generically, concerns have been mooted that it enforces naming conventions and field conventions which aren’t suitable/preferable for some projects. I suppose at first both of these were true. After all, ActiveObjects’s entire premise was convention over configuration, and this requires some restrictions by default. However, I don’t think it’s entirely accurate any longer.
Add your comment
