The more you vote, the better it gets. Login and vote now.
By kirillcool
via freesoftwaremagazine.com
Published: Jul 28 2008 / 07:23
Some people seem to challenge the idea that most (if not all) free software projects need a benevolent dictator—that is, somebody who has the last say on every decision. They are quick to point out Linus Torvalds’ past “mistakes” (see the speech marks): using BitKeeper to manage the kernel, not allowing “pluggable” schedulers in Linux, etc. As a software developer, I feel that a dictator is absolutely necessary in every free software project. Here is why.
Add your comment
Voters For This Link (16)
-
kirillcool -
deterb -
polterguy -
Thierry.Lefort -
matt -
fb39110
-
bscarr -
yumariso
-
joecoder -
mavroprovato
-
alashcraft -
mswatcher -
thinkingserious -
alruiz15 -
rkg
-
davneter
