By Thierry.Lefort
via streaminglearningcenter.com
Published: Mar 11 2010 / 10:44
In part, Steve Jobs stated that the iPad didn't support Flash because it was a "CPU Hog," so Apple used a technology called HTML5 instead. Since the comparative efficiency of Flash vs. HTML5 seemed easy enough to quantify, I endeavored to do so, using YouTube's new HTML5-based player as the test bed. Specifically, I played a YouTube video in the same browser twice, once via HTML5, once via Flash, and measured CPU utilization during playback.
-
Caching mechanism in Data visualization software
-
Hibernate 4 Spring 3 Migration on Weblogic Server
-
How To Setup php-fpm And Nginx On CentOS 6
-
The Cloud is Shifting Power from Vendors to Channel Partners
-
Resize Shape Height/Width of Visio Diagram & Improved Shape Connectivity
-
Getting Started With Glimpse In ASP.NET MVC
Comments
pt93903 replied ago:
from: http://www.dzone.com/links/does_html5_really_beat_flash_the_surprising_resul.html
quote: "some people have pointed out that Ozer has done seminars and written books featuring Adobe products, so therefore he makes money from the success of Adobe Flash"
Voters For This Link (6)
Voters Against This Link (1)