Link Details

whats the big deal ?

If you don't get it by now you probably never will.

Only fools go after scripting languages,

we competent programmers can do in 1 year what you cant even in ten years.

If you really do think that, then you are the greater fool by far, as you clearly have zero knowledge or understanding of where languages like groovy fit in. And what's worse your ignorance is wilful.

http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=groovy,+clojure,+scala,+jruby&l=

It's the java.next language.

Groovy sucks and here is why --> http://www.dzone.com/links/getting_dynamic_productivity_in_a_static_language.html#56362531

So there's still no overhaul to do compile-time static types and type inference

In Adobe's ActionScript3 languages, it's possible to have both static type classes and dynamic objects that behave much as they do in JavaScript - all within the same application.

Scripting is not programming.


Programming = Superior productivity.

Groovy has still a long way to go,

http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=groovy%2C+vb6&l=