Link Details

Link 62352 thumbnail
User 168451 avatar

By aalmiray
via glaforge.free.fr
Published: Jan 20 2008 / 04:04

Graeme pointed me at a white-paperish article claiming Groovy would not be Enterprise-ready. If the article had been acurate, I would have welcomed it, and we could have found ways to improve Groovy to make it ready, but unfortunately, the author did not do his job properly, and only spread FUD by saying Groovy doesn't hold to its promises.
  • 21
  • 2
  • 1636
  • 418

Comments

Add your comment
User 60609 avatar

sigzero replied ago:

-2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

I was very disappointed that the article showed no code. Therefore, the article is bunk in my mind.

User 207606 avatar

glaforge replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

@sigzero, yup, I didn't include any code as the technical aspects are already covered by Graeme's blog and even further on Steven's post, but I wanted to focus more on commenting some assertions in the article, and to show my readers that Groovy was already heavily used in highly mission-critical applications by big companies. Next time I'll try to add some nuggets of code ;-)

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.