By cretzel
via stronglytypedblog.blogspot.com
Published: Feb 06 2010 / 19:42
I've been writing about a performance comparison between Java, Scala and Groovy in this and this post, where I compared the runtimes of these languages for a straight-forward (and far from idiomatic) implementation of the quicksort algorithm. As you might have heard, there's a new kid on the block: Groovy++ a.k.a. static Groovy. I was eager to see, how this would improve Groovy's results.
Add your comment
Voters For This Link (50)
-
cretzel -
alext -
aalmiray -
xymor
-
rsaddey -
gubbes
-
ksprague
-
loxal -
jweslley -
rv49649
-
shantanu_k06
-
aliz
-
mswatcher -
indrayam
-
milan.dinic -
jt-martijn
-
Konstantin.Scheglov -
alan_125
-
fifthposition -
designfreek -
dsachdev -
dbolene
-
mschab
-
scs
-
jfbriere
-
mitite -
mgkimsal
-
javathreads -
puredanger -
schorse
-
jakinik
-
yoram
-
www.google.com/profiles/jadhav.dilipkumar
-
frerk
-
LudoA
-
kodrbee -
mzgubin -
dubness -
tmo9d
-
daveklein
-
keyofdminor
-
bloid -
edgarchan
-
pmularien
-
javanperl
-
jbrush
-
opensas.myopenid.com
-
uehaj
-
awgatsby
-
Sedzia
