By cretzel
via stronglytypedblog.blogspot.com
Published: Feb 06 2010 / 19:42
I've been writing about a performance comparison between Java, Scala and Groovy in this and this post, where I compared the runtimes of these languages for a straight-forward (and far from idiomatic) implementation of the quicksort algorithm. As you might have heard, there's a new kid on the block: Groovy++ a.k.a. static Groovy. I was eager to see, how this would improve Groovy's results.
Add your comment
Voters For This Link (50)
-
cretzel -
alext -
aalmiray -
xymor -
rsaddey -
gubbes -
ksprague -
loxal -
jweslley -
rv49649 -
shantanu_k06 -
aliz -
mswatcher -
indrayam -
milan.dinic -
jt-martijn -
Konstantin.Scheglov -
alan_125 -
fifthposition -
designfreek -
dsachdev -
dbolene -
mschab -
scs -
jfbriere -
mitite -
mgkimsal -
javathreads -
puredanger -
schorse -
jakinik -
yoram -
www.google.com/profiles/jadhav.dilipkumar -
frerk -
LudoA -
kodrbee -
mzgubin -
dubness -
tmo9d -
daveklein -
keyofdminor -
bloid -
edgarchan -
pmularien -
javanperl -
jbrush -
opensas.myopenid.com -
uehaj -
awgatsby -
Sedzia