Link Details

Link 124055 thumbnail
User 240010 avatar

By nivanov
via grid-comp.blogspot.com
Published: Oct 08 2008 / 03:05

I'm not going to compare products themselves, more of that I'm not going to argue what is better and what is not. Let guys from Hadoop and GridGain spend (waste) their time on that.
  • 17
  • 16
  • 2118
  • 657

Comments

Add your comment
User 237121 avatar

Owen O'Malley replied ago:

2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

This is a badly written and researched article by one of the GridGain engineers, inspite of the author's claim of neutrality.

User 241974 avatar

dkharlamov replied ago:

-2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Former GridGain engineer. And let's agree that it's neutral

User 160542 avatar

Kirill Grouchnikov replied ago:

2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

And as always voted up to the main page only by GridGain developers.

User 240010 avatar

Nikita Ivanov replied ago:

-2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

I think this short overview is well balanced. If I were to write it - it would be a lot more scathing... Over hundreds of active users I have never seen Hadoop compared or competing with GridGain. We've seen plenty of GigaSpaces, some Terracotta - but never Hadoop. I have pretty good theory on why - but that's another topic.

Nikita Ivanov.
GridGain - Grid Computing Made Simple.

User 167628 avatar

cutting replied ago:

2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

> And let's agree that it's neutral [ ... ]

Why? Because you, the author, say so?

> I have never seen Hadoop compared or competing with GridGain.

That's perhaps because what you call MapReduce is not what the rest of the world calls MapReduce, but something different, and thus impossible to compare.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce

User 241974 avatar

dkharlamov replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Hey calm down. I don't like to see you both fighting.... Hmm but may be it's a good Idea to yourtube this fight :)) I think I would get a lot of comments and views on that ;). It does not matter how close is you to the certain rule or schema. It's all about usability and simplicity. I personally don't care if someone hides real map/reduce and gives me the way to execute on grid my code without writing map/reduce code. I will call it map/reduce if vendor says so.

User 237121 avatar

Owen O'Malley replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

The incorrect parts of the article are:
1. Splitting the input data and splitting computation work are isomorphic to each other. It is trivial in Hadoop to have splits that don't correspond to literal inputs.
2. GridGain doesn't implement Map/Reduce. It is a traditional distributed work queue manager that happens to have a method named "map" and a method named "reduce". It lacks any distributed sort or any capability for data intensive applications, which are the two defining characteristics of Map/Reduce. I wish the GridGain team would stop trying to confuse their potential customers by referring to their system as Map/Reduce.
3. Hadoop runs on Linux, Windows, Mac OS, and Solaris.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.