It's not like it's a half-day or anything like that. Login and vote now.
By nivanov
via jroller.com
Published: Jul 31 2008 / 16:06
I’ve been hearing lately ever increasing noise (or almost a propaganda) that software systems comprised off the best of breed products or subsystems are bad because they are too expensive to "integrate" - while highly-integrated and tightly coupled offerings are the way to go (since there is nothing to "integrate" – thus being "cheaper").
-
Keyboard Navigation for Input Fields using JQuery
-
DPC Radio: Implementing OAuth
-
New-age Transactional Systems
-
Hacking A Maven Dependency with Javassist to Fix It
-
Securing the Internet with DNSSEC
-
Passing data objects between CICS Java environments: Part 3: Transporting Java data objects from a CICS transaction Java client program to a CICS TS Java program
Comments
julian doherty replied ago:
Weak analogy
Dhananjay Nene replied ago:
The post talks about what style of integration is better (solution) without either reflecting on customer diversity or defining customer needs (problem it is solving).
Voters For This Link (10)
Voters Against This Link (4)