Link Details

Link 138232 thumbnail
User 276353 avatar

By javathreads
via blogs.citytechinc.com
Published: Dec 02 2008 / 13:31

If conferences like JavaOne are a High School Pep Rally, then “No Fluff, Just Stuff” is skipping out on the rally, and smoking in the parking lot with the Cool Kids. While at the J1 keynote Rich Green envisions “Java on all the screens of your life”, at NFJS, Stuart Halloway declares without ceremony that “Java is dead”.
  • 21
  • 10
  • 2361
  • 1147

Comments

Add your comment
User 359739 avatar

thenonhacker replied ago:

-1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

I am a Java Developer.

I used to program in Turbo Pascal, then a bit of Visual Basic, ASP, and then now, Java.

Java is still alive, yes, but I cannot deny the fact that one day it will die. Remember that Sun has laid of 6,000 workers, and unless IBM buys them out, I will err on the side of anticipating Java will eventually die.

User 306525 avatar

newton_dave replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

So will the universe; saying Java will eventually die really isn't much of a stretch.

That aside, it sure sounds like the article writer is saying Java is a good language, and I just don't see it the same way.

User 281050 avatar

cbang replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Java has always been a good-enough language. This has been its strength over time but is now turning out to be its demise. Evolution has stopped and the programming model has more or less played out its role, the upcoming concurrency issue will be the final stroke. The problem is, we do not have an alternative (and no, Scala ain't it).

User 181930 avatar

jwenting replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

right. And that's been said for over a decade now.
Those of us who've been using Java for a long time know that you can almost set the clock to the "Java is dead" and "Java will die unless it is changed to have XXXX" messages, they arrive at least once a week and have since before the first production release hit the street.

User 306525 avatar

newton_dave replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

When Java came out I was programming Smalltalk full-time. We sort of looked at it (Java) and chuckled and wondered what the point was. Some of us learned Java anyway (heck, I still have my JavaOS book), but we're still a bit bewildered as to what exactly happened.

User 338269 avatar

OtengiM replied ago:

3 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

If Java is dead so it is C++ and PHP and Ruby and Python and thousand of OpenSource languages. This people are Trolls and they like to make FUD. Java is here to stay as any OpenSource Language, You Trolls idiots does not understand that?.

User 338269 avatar

OtengiM replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

If you are worry about concurrency so use a language built for it as Haskell or Erlang. Java is for resolve Business server side problems. You want High performance concurrency use Erlang or Haskell, You want High performance graphics use C or C++, you want to create quickly a web application use Python or Ruby or PHP, You want to script your Unix use Perl.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.