Link Details

Link 1065203 thumbnail
User 225256 avatar

By mswatcher
Submitted: Nov 13 2013 / 11:13

One of the things that I liked in LevelDB is that it pretty much had compression built in from day one. The entire format is built to save space just about wherever it can. From using 7 bit numbers to prefix compression to making compression core part of the on disk data structure. Considering the cost of I/O, it is usually worth trading CPU time for I/O costs. LMDB, in contrast, went quite the opposite way. It actively discourage compression, since you have no support in the format. But it is more than that, LMDB is meant to be used by directly getting a memory pointer, and it actively encourage you to do such things as have a pointer reference from one record to another record.
  • 4
  • 0
  • 107
  • 20

Add your comment

Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (4)

Voters Against This Link (0)

    Debugging JavaScript
    Written by: Ashutosh Sharma
    Featured Refcardz: Top Refcardz:
    1. Design Patterns
    2. OO JS
    3. Cont. Delivery
    4. Java EE7
    5. HTML5 Mobile
    1. Java EE7
    2. Spring Annotations
    3. Git
    4. Java
    5. REST