By puredanger
via netzooid.com
Published: Jul 25 2008 / 07:50
WSO2 has felt the need over the past few months to make many false claims about Mule’s performance. I ran their benchmarks. Sure enough, with their configuration, Mule performance was crappy. There were a couple fatal flaws with their benchmark though.
Tweet
SaveShareSend
Tags: java, open source, server, web services
-
Karl Shifflett’s WPF and Silverlight shared design-time code
-
The New Apple iPad – 11 Sayings for Apple Tablet PC
-
lambdaj 2.1 improves its closures and more
-
Devmentia: Comment or Don't Comment, var or no var, It Doesn't Matter
-
Mark Reinhold on Jigsaw - live notes from devoxx
-
Live from Googleplex: Chrome OS details revealed
Comments
AfkhamAzeez replied ago:
The statement that WSO2 made false claims is itself false. If you do some searching on the forums, you will see that WSO2 has been asking for the proper configurations parameters and other relevant information regarding Mule, but there was no response or cooperation from Mule folks. The fact remains that most of these performance tuning information are not provided in the documentation.
Voters For This Link (7)
Voters Against This Link (1)