Link Details

Link 145714 thumbnail
User 369258 avatar

By techcrammer
via techcrammer.com
Published: Jan 02 2009 / 08:18

For those of you hoping that Visual Basic 6.0 will stay around forever, here is a fresh look at a possible alternative that is also cross-platform.
  • 8
  • 0
  • 1223
  • 383

Comments

Add your comment
User 285418 avatar

Motion Control replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

But it costs REAL money!

User 369258 avatar

techcrammer replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Yep, good point Motion Control especially if you are doing commercial work and using their external server database (not the one included). However, the personal/educational one is offered at a pretty reasonable price. I admittedly may have never even gotten into it if it weren't for the trial edition they offer, which I liked in just a few minutes. Using mostly Open Source products over the past 6 years this is one of the few products I have actually found myself purchasing (other than some web graphic software). Though I try to donate time or money to some of the Open Source products that we use to keep them going.

User 338269 avatar

OtengiM replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

VB 6 also was expensive, The people who would like to continue to work the traditional VB way RealBasic is the way and it is multiplatform, it supports Windows, Linux and Mac with native Look and Feel, Databases, Graphics etc. It is great product.

I lately Im doing a lot with wxPython, qtHaskell and JavaFX for desktop apps but not anymore Basic language.

User 369258 avatar

techcrammer replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Hello OtengiM, I am also finding alot of my new code being easier to do in Python, even some of the stuff I use to do in Perl (which I still do have a bias for). The only GUI stuff I have done in Python was using the "defacto" TKinter, do you recommend wxPython over this? I might give it a try.

User 205784 avatar

cbegin replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Link in the article is wrong... http://www.realsoftware.com/realbasic/

I also agree that the cost is a non-starter. The personal edition should just be free. Languages are too great an investment in time and energy to risk. To charge even $100 is a hurdle that most won't bother jumping over, especially for a language that is so fragmented as BASIC. If it was free, I might spend the time to play with it.

In addition, notice the annual "renewal" costs... 50% of the cost ($250) per year to renew? Ouch.

User 369258 avatar

techcrammer replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Thanks cbegin, I updated the URL.

User 187417 avatar

sproketboy replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

This is news? RealBasic has been around for years.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (8)



Voters Against This Link (0)