«« Next » « Previous
«« Next » « Previous

Link Details

Link 72688 thumbnail

By bloid
via blog.thinkrelevance.com
Submitted: Mar 26 / 03:17

As people spend more time with Ruby 1.9, JRuby, and Rubinius, we are seeing a lot more benchmarks. It has been a while since we published any metrics, so I thought now would be a good time to summarize our recent experience on some real projects.
  • 6
  • 4
  • 1384
  • 657

Comments

Add your comment
User 210175 avatar

jtheory replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Summary: performance was sufficient for our projects, according to our developers & customers.
This is not terribly useful since they don't actually describe the projects or the performance requirements involved.

It's a good point that many, many web apps have a known, limited user base, fairly simple processing requirements, and the bottleneck's going to be on the database anyway... in which case you should be using the programming language/framework/etc. that will make you most productive and give you the most maintainable code, since its performance is almost irrelevant.

This is not true of all projects, though.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (6)



Voters Against This Link (4)