By nivanov
via gridgaintech.wordpress.com
Published: Aug 22 2010 / 07:40
I’ve read yet another blog saying in so many words the same thing: Scala is just more complex than Java. Enough has been written about it but I just want to mention two trivia facts that I always bring about when I speak about GridGain and Scala...
Comments
Dave Newton replied ago:
Keyword/symbol count is only one measure of complexity, and doesn't seem like a particularly good one.
RawThinkTank replied ago:
Dave Newton replied ago:
Lambdas are a curse to program readability?! Closures are *essential* to program readability, and necessary for concise expressiveness. I can't even fathom where a statement like that comes from.
Nikita Ivanov replied ago:
They come from ignorance and incompetence.
RawThinkTank replied ago:
Now, look, i am a super intelligent man, these things and things like AOP are a piece of cake for me, but that dont mean i should impose them on meer humans.
and yes Lamda is crap.
Dave Newton replied ago:
(Not super-intelligent enough to use the "Reply" link, though? ;)
They're not imposed--they're an option. But my specific comment was regarding your statement that closures == unreadable, which is nuts.
RawThinkTank replied ago:
Yes , when variable declaration is unseen , the code is not readable, its insane.
May be you are one of a sheeple.
Dave Newton replied ago:
"Variable declaration is unseen"? What does that even mean? You can do things with a POJO no human can do?
So, when *you* use AOP and closures you're "super-human", when *I* do, I'm a sheeple? Not only do you not make any sense, you're rude, too, and it's impossible to take you even remotely seriously.
RawThinkTank replied ago:
Just because you can do or like something dont mean its good.
some like to go on a serial killing spree, that dont mean its good.
Dave Newton replied ago:
Just because I like something doesn't mean it's bad, either. Kinda depends on what I like, doesn't it. Next analogy.
Voters For This Link (23)
Voters Against This Link (11)