Link Details

Link 84203 thumbnail
User 1 avatar

By rick
via rails-bits-bytes.blogspot.com
Published: Jun 02 2008 / 14:23

I needed to create a Rails application that wasn't going to use a database backend. In my case I was going to be using REST services to access the data, so I had no need for database integration.
  • 6
  • 3
  • 1187
  • 237

Comments

Add your comment
User 275423 avatar

lifewithryan replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

I can't get to the link from here (websense at work..shhh) anyway, whenever I see someone mention rails with the DB (and therefore Active Record) I am forced to ask "why rails"? To me Rails minus AR makes zero sense. Granted you still get to use Ruby, but isn't there another Ruby framework out there you could use if a DB isn't needed? (I really don't know, I'm asking). I'll have to wait to read the article, and probably should have before I commented, but I go with my gut...

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (6)



Voters Against This Link (3)