Subversion
Written by: Lorna Jane Mitchell
Featured Refcardz: Top Refcardz:
  1. Git
  2. DNS
  3. Data Mining
  4. Spring Data
  5. Subversion
  1. Spring Data
  2. Subversion
  3. Spring Config.
  4. Spring Annotations
  5. Data Mining

Link Details

Link 852747 thumbnail
User 981871 avatar

By gregschulz
via storageio.com
Published: Sep 22 2012 / 12:41

Unfortunately consolidation is commonly misunderstood to be the sole function or value proposition of server virtualization given its first wave focus. I agree that not all applications or servers should be consolidated (note that I did not say virtualized).
  • 5
  • 0
  • 518
  • 1068

Comments

Add your comment
User 1064815 avatar

Chris_Travers replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

I don't think everything should be virtualized. Virtualization means complexity in management for high performance applications, like database servers. Yes with enough effort you can get the performance you want but it is a lot of effort to go to and for very little benefit.

User 981871 avatar

gregschulz replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Chris when you say that there is little benefit vs. effort for high performance applications such as databases, are referring to the traditional virtualization objectives focused around consolidation, reducing hardware and so forth? Of are you also reffering to little benefit from having agility to move applications from one fast server to another for maintenance, HA, BC, DR, etc..? Granted that there are costs in terms of licesening and in some cases hardware, not to mention new skillsets and training for those that do not currently exist. Curious to hear more on your thinking in terms of what lack of benefits or also additional complexities. thks in advance.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (5)



Voters Against This Link (0)