Link Details

Link 123965 thumbnail
User 273220 avatar

By evan chooly
via dmlloyd.blogspot.com
Published: Oct 07 2008 / 20:43

I'm not a language lawyer by any stretch of the imagination, but this looks to be a much nicer proposal for closures in Java without all the need for syntactical and VM gymnastics.
  • 18
  • 1
  • 1761
  • 552

Comments

Add your comment
User 111696 avatar

bloid replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

link changed to point straight to article..

Please avoid using tinyurl or similar...

User 273220 avatar

evan chooly replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

sorry. just habit. noted, though. :)

User 111696 avatar

bloid replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

:) Thanks

User 336684 avatar

soulcutter replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Finally a closure proposal that actually makes sense. It's just too bad BGGA seems to have so much momentum.

User 338269 avatar

OtengiM replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Get this proposal quick to JCP and OpenJDK 7 and be done with this.

User 255959 avatar

yardena replied ago:

2 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Before people get carried away - this proposal does not support delayed evaluation of a closure, and as such can't be used in many scenarios where closures are used in other languages. Concurrency API?
So it's not half as powerful as BGGA, I mean it is nice that people are creative with language proposals, but let's just chill down the excitement.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.