Vote up, vote down. It doesn't matter which - just vote! Login and vote now.
By infonote
via lijinjoseji.wordpress.com
Published: Nov 30 2007 / 01:18
-
Create a fast C Python extension with Cython tutorial
-
Referencing 2.0 Web Services (asmx) in Visual Studio 2008
-
Is Managed Code Slower Than Unmanaged Code?
-
5 Things I Like Better about Visual Studio then NetBeans
-
The timeframe for culture change
-
[OSCON 2008] Google XML Pages (GXP) by Harry Heymann and Laurence Gonsalves
Comments
p3t0r replied ago:
I've used JSF (Well, MyFaces and Seam... wasn't JSF a specification?) and SpringMVC extensively and sure, there are good things in both of them. I really think they don't belong in the upper regions of 'best java web frameworks' though!
wittgen replied ago:
I hope that list isn't in order of preference.
Voted down for the bible bashing.
wonglik replied ago:
Hmm I do not agree with the autor. Do You really think Wicked is better then Tapestry , which is not even on the list? I like spring but spring MVC is not so nice.
pt93903 replied ago:
Bad article. One good thing I found from the comments is this proof that anyone who uses Google trends or job-site keyword trends to "prove" that one framework is better is just wasting our time: http://icoloma.blogspot.com/2007/07/stupid-conclusions-using-google-trends.html
Please don't encourage people using these kinds of bogus arguments. What IMHO is needed is technical comparisons just like this one:
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/
Voters For This Link (16)
Voters Against This Link (13)