By gst
via boscoh.com
Published: Oct 26 2007 / 04:08
I’ve finally a worth replacement for C++, which I’ve used a lot in the last 10 years. I’ve written a protein viewer in C++. I’ve done research for scientific papers in C++. But yet, even though I’ve tried to take the moral high road with the STL, C++ just feels ugly and un-weildy.
I remember the horrendous learning curve from C to C++. There was so much to get right – C++ throws out the compactness of C for a baroque welding of different programming paradigms and backwards-compatibility.
So it was with some trepidation that I tried out D, yet another saviour for C++ programmers. Now that I’ve been using it for a few months, I have to say, do believe the hype.
Comments
dzonelurker replied ago:
Right, C++ is on the decline. But D is DOA!
herval replied ago:
Bleed C++, Bleeeeed!
What a title...
sproketboy replied ago:
"I’ve finally a worth replacement for C++," ... ?
Learn English first.
dzonelurker is right. D is not worth it.
Voters For This Link (21)
Voters Against This Link (1)