«« Next » « Previous
«« Next » « Previous

Link Details

Your votes power DZone. Login and vote now.
Link 80823 thumbnail

By bloid
via surana.wordpress.com
Submitted: May 13 2008 / 17:59

Lots of people are commenting on Steve Yegge’s talk “Dynamic Languages Strike Back“, so I’ll add my 2 cents. I’m a hardcore Scheme & Lisp programmer, but even I will reluctantly admit that static typing is important and useful. The primary reason I still use Scheme is because I won’t ever give up macros. On to the talk: Yegge spends too much time arguing that the performance of dynamic languages can match static languages, especially since many (Java & C#) are using reflection as a poor man’s dynamism anyway.
  • 1
  • 1
  • 103
  • 28

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.

Voters For This Link (1)



Voters Against This Link (1)