By pte
via blogs.atlassian.com
Published: Nov 05 2008 / 22:36
An argument roughly in the vein that constantly re-running redundant unit tests is not only a waste of time and resources but probably promoting poor practices, i.e. less local test runs, reliance on CI to find build breakages, less resolution (more commits) in CI builds, etc. The article promotes using code coverage to identify tests effected by code changes and only running those.
-
What Was Steve Jobs's High School GPA? Not 4.0, or Even 3.0
-
Justice Department ‘set to validate’ Google-Motorola Merger
-
Securing Virtual Desktops
-
041 RR Code Metrics
-
Using JavaScript’s Prototype with MVC
-
Cloud Standards Customer Council Forms Security Working Group and Initiates Work on Service Level Agreement Guidance Document
Add your comment
Voters For This Link (18)
-
pte -
tgdavies -
openid.atlassian.com/users/gcrain
-
openid.atlassian.com/users/mchai
-
parthak.myopenid.com
-
wanderingwalrus
-
pmcneil -
hogiedude
-
mswatcher -
rsmaniak
-
socker -
yardena -
bloid -
fdiotalevi
-
dkharlamov -
brendan.humphreys
-
Shooshpanchick
-
psyho
