By bloid
via techworld.com
Published: Nov 26 2006 / 20:30
![]() | |
| HTML5 Canvas | |
| Written by: Simon Sarris | |
| Featured Refcardz: Top Refcardz: | |
| 150+ Refcardz Available · Get them all | |
By bloid
via techworld.com
Published: Nov 26 2006 / 20:30
Comments
johannz complained ago:
johannz reported this link as inaccurate on 11/26/2006 @ 12:51:22
Quite likely inaccurate
see digg article about some issues with his claim
http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Scam_of_Indian_student_developing_technology_to_store_450_GB_on_paper
Lowell Heddings replied ago:
The comments by 17 year olds on digg aren't really all that useful.... if you imagine scanning in a picture at the highest resolution possible, the file is gigantic, and that's without any compression.
Using a good compression algorithm, it's highly plausible that this could work, although not sure how useful it really is.
ilazarte complained ago:
ilazarte reported this link as inaccurate on 11/26/2006 @ 09:07:18
it's a controversial article and that warrants flagging. someone even analyzed how many dots could be reliably printed on a piece of paper; it smells of a complete fake to me.
Ricky Clarkson complained ago:
rickyclarkson reported this link as inaccurate on 11/26/2006 @ 09:35:44
There's a slashdot thread about this, with maths and reasoning that looks accurate to me - this does seem like garbage.
If I arrange 8 bits into an octagon, they're still 8 bits.
bloid replied ago:
This is the slashdot coverage of this link: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/26/140240
As usual with SlashDot, don't expect as polite a discussion as here ;)
bigbold complained ago:
bigbold reported this link as inaccurate on 11/26/2006 @ 09:56:45
This story is absolute nonsense.
jrb complained ago:
jeyrb reported this link as lame on 11/27/2006 @ 03:23:00
This is digg crap not dzone
Voters For This Link (9)
Voters Against This Link (0)