Link Details

I voted up because the post is interesting; but I think 64kb is not a problem. After all we struggle to keep methods small in favour of testing, putting a barrier on terribly long method is a good thing.
I think it is dynamic languages fault here, or to be more precise, a fault by their implementations on the jvm.
Just my 2 cents, of course.

@pentolino:
I agree and yet disagree with you. Yes, we should try to keep methods small in favor of testing, etc.
However, it is fairly common these days for JavaScript developers to wrap functions inside functions (inner functions). For example, you will see the following kind of code a lot on the web today:

{function(){

      function() {...}        

      function() {...}  

      function() {...}

      function() {...}

  }();