Link Details

Link 85581 thumbnail
User 252611 avatar

By Thierry.Lefort
via java.dzone.com
Published: Jun 07 2008 / 16:51

JadeLiquid Software™ is pleased to announce the release of the WebRenderer™ Swing Edition 4.2. The WebRenderer Swing Edition is the world’s only Java browser SDK built upon Firefox™ 2.0 and rendering in 100% pure Swing.
  • 10
  • 4
  • 1663
  • 310

Comments

Add your comment
User 217792 avatar

demetrios replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

If it's based on FireFox than it can't be 100% pure Swing, so the title is misleading.

User 252611 avatar

Thierry.Lefort replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Most Swing components are lightweight, that means that they are not native. The only Heavyweight component with native resources is the Window other Swing components are drawn into. Other java browsers(other than the JEditorPane but can we call this a browser?) were native heavyweight components and you had to take some precaution before adding them to your GUI, like for exemple making your menu and tooltips heavyweight if you did not you would have some repaint problems as the browser would always be before your menu and hide them.
This one is lightweight that makes him a 100% pure swing component.

User 168256 avatar

jadeliquid replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

demetrios, as Thierry noted WebRenderer Swing Edition is a lightweight Swing component.

Before making assertions why not just download WebRenderer Swing Edition and try it for yourself? It is 100% lightweight Swing. All drawing is Swing (yes Swing g.drawString etc) and no native components are utilized in the drawing/rendering with the exception of third party plugins such as Applets and Flash.

Being the developer of this product it is interesting to see doubt being cast. There are no tricks here. Swing performs all the rendering.

User 217792 avatar

demetrios replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

> Before making assertions why not just download WebRenderer Swing Edition and try it for yourself?
I wanted to try it a few years ago, but I couldn't: just to download a simple trial, it required just too much information from me as a user, so I gave up. I evaluated many hundreds of libraries/products, and if for each it would have been so bureaucratic like this product, than I would be already old :).
It must not be the same in this case, but from my experience, if a getting a trial is so complicated, than there's something to hide (e.g. a very very high price tag :) ).

User 152955 avatar

Gregg Bolinger replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Cool stuff. It would be nice if you had pricing on your site instead of having to contact someone first. That's a turn off.

User 270877 avatar

killerweb replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Not sure why any developer would pay for something that soon will be free and included in the JDK.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.