«« Next » « Previous
«« Next » « Previous

Link Details

Link 74329 thumbnail
User 111696 avatar

By bloid
via dobbscodetalk.com
Published: Apr 04 2008 / 19:45

This question has been asked repeatedly over the years. And yet, the phenomenon continues. For eight years, Delphi was vastly superior to Visual Studio, particularly Visual Basic. Then Microsoft got serious about creating a strong development environment and toolset. Borland struggled to keep up with the pace of changes Microsoft was making, in particular with .NET. Delphi 2007, released two years after .NET 2.0, was not capable of doing .NET 2.0 development.
  • 21
  • 4
  • 1548
  • 591

Comments

Add your comment
User 236137 avatar

dzonelurker replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

There are only 3 reasons for the decline of Delphi: Borland, Inprise and CodeGEAR.

User 278035 avatar

ararog replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Why use Delphi if we have Chrome as Object Pascal for .NET platform?

User 278035 avatar

ararog replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

If the intention is .NET development, then Chrome can solve the problem.

User 182143 avatar

mezmo replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Many reasons, most are marketing but just look at all the crap they're complaining about with Java, verbose, statically typed, yadda yadda yadda. All also true for Delphi. The only thing you couldn't hang on Delphi is the closures, those you should be able to do, since they already have a function type. Verbosity was a major point of contention between the Delphi advocates vs Powerbuilder advocates. It all just comes around again. I've always said that Java really was the love child of C/C++ and Delphi.

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.