Published: Aug 29 2013 / 11:15
Didn't read. Just the title is wonked. .NET was one of the software industry's greatest successes of all-time. It was on par with, and for some time in excess of, the Java ecosystem. I've been in the industry for 15 years and never had it so good as I did with .NET. Clearly you didn't get it. So sorry for your loss.
I upvoted the article, because I think it was well written and presented well. I don't agree with it a bit though. Calling the death of .Net is simply wrong. It's growing and flourishing, while not as talked about in "hacker" hipster startup circles. It's a platform for grown ups, and that's why it's used in things like financial institutions, corporate enterprises, government etc. It's "big iron" and not the best choice for your beer finder app, doesn't mean it's dead. I agree with stimpy77, after working over the years I love it, and so do lots of others. You can call it dead and talk about how it died once people stop using it in masses like they are now.
I've also upvoted because of the arguments. "People coded to .Net because they were coding for SharePoint or BizTalk" - I work in a company that has generally Java and .NET division. I like .NET both as a platform and as a language (C#) but when I look at what my colleagues do in full-time, it's 100% SharePoint WebParts for the customers who bought SharePoint once and have to stick with it forewer. In my previous company there were many .NET Forms projects but all have started in the old days where fat clients were actually needed. All new projects are Web/Mobile based and it just means Web=Java, Mobile=Android... So I've upvoted the criticism of the .NET-community attitude that ".NET will replace Java" - it won't. regards Grzegorz Grzybek
Many people have also prematurely called the death of Java as well, just as false. .Net has made a lot of inroads to replacing Java on the Desktop, but never really succeeded there either, just became a viable alternative. Android arguably brought Java back, but if you look at the big iron enterprise, Java never left.
Let's be clear, I don't think .NET is dead yet. It will continue to be the Windows API of the present so long as people write only-Windows apps, it will be around.
... Acknowledging that the reason why .NET via Mono did not get traction on Linux / Mac is because enterprises didn't adopt it there, because if they wanted to go the free/open source route they already have Java and if they wanted to go the paid license / paid full support route they want the "real deal" route of the Microsoft stack. If Java didn't exist .NET would be everywhere. Except on iOS. Then again, if Java didn't exist there would have been no incentive for Microsoft to create .NET in the first place.
pppptttt you're making the points I made in the article yet stated you didn't read it. Too boring.
The points I finally concluded with were concessions. I did look over your article, after all these comments; my initial first comment about my not reading it is no longer accurate. (My reaction stands.)
A nice contrast to this article: an analysis of .NET (called the .NET Initiative back then) when .NET just started http://informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=21465
The .NET Initiative had virtually nothing to do with the .NET technology. The .NET Initiative was the name given to Microsoft being clueless as to how they should brand and sloganize themselves as a company over the next few years. The article you link to illustrates the mass confusion Microsoft brought upon itself during a moment of unique opportunity they created for themselves with the actual technology.
Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy - © 1997-2014, DZone, Inc.