HTML5 Canvas
Written by: Simon Sarris
Featured Refcardz: Top Refcardz:
  1. Apache Hadoop
  2. Web Driver
  3. MVVM
  4. REST
  5. ADO.NET
  1. HTML5
  2. Ajax
  3. jQuery Selectors
  4. CSS Part 1
  5. Git

Link Details

Link 136141 thumbnail
User 306525 avatar

By newton_dave
via joshuajava.wordpress.com
Published: Nov 24 2008 / 19:38

A guy offers some reasons people might not want to use Flex and compares it with some functionality from Tapestry. I am not associated with Flex or Tapestry.
  • 15
  • 14
  • 2120
  • 0

Comments

Add your comment
User 351026 avatar

Ola Bildtsen replied ago:

-4 votes [show comment] Vote down Vote up Reply
User 204759 avatar

thejavafreak replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

How could Flex be an application framework? It doesn't have what an application frameworks should have.

User 162813 avatar

codecraig replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

@thejavafreak: such as....??

User 204759 avatar

thejavafreak replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

* Email sending
* Report
* DB Connection. Including transactional support
* Security. Authorization and authentication

It all relies on what's on the server. Flex only send data to the server (or the backend) to process it. How could you say it's an application framework. Clearly it's a view presentation only. Look at Seam or Spring and you'll get what I mean.

User 338269 avatar

Miloskov replied ago:

1 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

It means it is not mature enough yet. Thats why I would like people to appreciate Swing because is already very mature and it could work for RIA with JRE6_10.

User 226784 avatar

Amr Ellafy replied ago:

0 votes Vote down Vote up Reply

Flex is not an application Framework and it should be wired to the Framework of your choice (asp.net, java or php). I think Flex is doing very well for client UI

Add your comment


Html tags not supported. Reply is editable for 5 minutes. Use [code lang="java|ruby|sql|css|xml"][/code] to post code snippets.