By gst
via xruby.blogspot.com
Published: Mar 07 2007 / 15:35
Two weeks ago, Antonio Cangiano compared the performance of different ruby implementations using Ruby 1.9 (YARV)'s benchmark suite. His numbers got me thinking: all alternative implementations performed badly -- most are even way slower than ruby 1.8.5. Does it signal that JVM and .NET are bad platform for Ruby language?
-
SQL SERVER – A Puzzle Part 2 – Fun with SEQUENCE in SQL Server 2012 – Guess the Next Value
-
Choosing Between References and Pointers in C++
-
CSS3 For Internet Explorer: Handy Compatibility Tools and Resources
-
Billions of API calls traversing Web, redefining “software”
-
Using WebSockets and CDI with Apache TomEE
-
Node Streams
Add your comment
